Vote with your Wallet

Vote with your Wallet

We are stuck with the dilemma of who can win the election versus someone who can run the country better than it has been in the past.

Without getting into the weeds about what constitutes “Better” Because that is a very subjective measure. Let’s focus on economics. Both of the presidential choices on the center stage have driven our country into unsustainable debt and enacted policies that will mean future generations will suffer.

As RFK Jr. points out, neither political choice, republican or democrat, will address the difficult problems because they are so unpopular that nobody would vote for them. At the same time, these basic foundational issues are at the heart of the unsustainable, inequitable, and perpetually destructive forces ripping our country apart. Our current system of government/corporate incest only serves to enrich a few at the expense of the many. This will end badly, and all signs indicate sooner rather than later.

It’s deadlocked in a vote with no winner. Either outcome, and we, the people, suffer. The 1% think they win, but that, too, is an illusion. Really, the coming years have global implications economically, environmentally, and culturally significant enough that a ranch in New Zealand will not be far away enough.

Those in government will not turn on their corporate masters, and the light at the end of the tunnel they point to is an oncoming train. This leaves “we the people” with one and only one alternative: revolution. Guns and Bombs are not the sort of revolution I am referring to. Rather, I am referring to changing the rules of the game.

What game, you ask? The game being played daily by corporate government power brokers is “the money game.” It’s rigged. We all know it, but we keep playing, hoping to break out and get a ranch in New Zealand. The rules are about “control,” pure and simple. Strip away all the jargon, and our money system is very broken. It has been for a long time, and we are just now dealing with the final death throes.

New Money — New Rules

But money is so complicated and varied worldwide, so how could we possibly change it? It is happening as we speak. Lyn Alden, Michael Saylor, Jeff Booth, and a growing host of other visionaries are holding a light that is not an oncoming train. The new money rules favor everyone engaged in commerce rather than a select few at the top of the game.

How could this be, you ask?

This corrupt money game has been played for over 5000 years, and it’s only since the invention of a global network (aka the internet) that a solution has become available. Smart phones and that global network have changed the world in developed as well as underdeveloped countries irrevocably. A trove of information and knowledge is available to all (yes even in North Korea and China despite their best efforts) and along with it comes a digital currency equally as radical.

This unstoppable development will quickly consume all 160+ currencies available today because a currency is government money, and gold and Bitcoin are real money.

Change money, we change the rules.

Imagine a government needs to ask you if you will help them by funding a war. This has never been the case throughout history. They just abused the currency, hurting everyone, but they had their war.

Imagine working and earning less and having a better standard of living. Bitcoin can do this, but the debt-based currency game cannot.

This does not exist only in imagination; it is here today, and it is growing in use. This gini does not go back into the bottle. Governments and corporations see the writing on the wall, and those in favor of controls don’t like it. Those in favor of a vital and growing economic system controlled by rules agreed upon by all players in the marketplace are on board.

The Real Vote

When it comes to real change, vote with your wallet. Using currency, you support the corrupt money game and the overlords who control it. Using Bitcoin, you take that control away, and we can all imagine something better.

My AI editor tells me.

Evidence: “The post makes several strong claims. Consider including more specific data or examples to support these assertions.”

Tone: “While passion is good, some statements may come across as overly dramatic or conspiratorial. A more measured tone might be more persuasive to skeptical readers.”

I disagree; it’s an opinion intended to be shocking and a wake-up call. And as usual, don’t take my word for it; do some real critical thinking with an open mind, as several brilliant leaders mentioned above have told you will come to the same conclusions. Bitcoin can change the world.